IELTS Writing Checker
Use Auvoxi Studio to check IELTS Writing Task 1 and Task 2 responses, receive an AI-estimated band score, and review detailed feedback based on IELTS Writing criteria.
Stop writing opinions in Task 1. Never use I think, In my opinion, or To conclude with a personal view.
Check your writing now.
Get an estimated band score and a short diagnosis of the most important issue in your response.
See a full Task 1 sample report.
The sample below shows the criteria scores, priority fixes, detailed feedback, highlighted writing issues, and original task context available after checking a Task 1 response in Auvoxi Studio.
Full Sample Task 1 Report Collapse or expand
Overall Result
2026-04-17 00:00:00
Criteria Scores
Priority Action Plan
💡 To improve your score by 0.5 - 1.0 band, make sure to master these 3 priorities:
Validity Checklist
Overall Feedback
This essay demonstrates a fundamental misunderstanding of IELTS Writing Task 1. Instead of providing an objective, factual summary of the diagram, it reads like a Task 2 opinion essay. While the core steps of the recycling process are mentioned, the inclusion of personal views, invented details, and frequent grammatical errors significantly lower the score.
- Including personal opinions and recommendations in a Task 1 report.
- Adding information and specific examples that are not present in the source diagram.
- Incorrect formation of the passive voice, which is crucial for process descriptions.
Criteria Breakdown
The response addresses the task by describing the stages of the process, but it is severely compromised by the inclusion of personal opinions and information not found in the diagram.
- Identifies the main stages of the process from collection to the final products.
- Attempts to group the recyclable materials into distinct categories.
- Includes extensive personal opinions, which is strictly forbidden in Task 1.
- Invents details not shown in the diagram, such as waste being burned in the factory and items going back to shops.
- The overview is subjective rather than an objective summary of the main features.
Eliminate all personal opinions, recommendations, and outside knowledge. Only report exactly what is visible in the diagram.
Information is presented with some organization, but the overall structure is inappropriate for a Task 1 report, resembling a Task 2 essay instead.
- Follows the chronological order of the process diagram.
- Uses basic paragraphing to separate different parts of the description.
- The introduction and conclusion are formatted like an opinion essay.
- Cohesive devices are used mechanically and repetitively.
- Referencing is sometimes unclear or inaccurate.
Adopt a strictly objective, report-style structure. Use a clear introductory sentence, an objective overview paragraph, and logical body paragraphs without a concluding opinion.
The vocabulary is limited and often informal, with noticeable errors in spelling and word formation that occasionally cause difficulty for the reader.
- Successfully uses some vocabulary from the diagram, such as sorting facility and landfill disposal.
- Frequent spelling errors.
- Relies on basic, informal vocabulary.
- Inaccurate word choices appear throughout the response.
Focus on learning the correct spelling of common words and use more precise, academic vocabulary suitable for describing a technical process.
The essay attempts some complex structures, but grammatical errors are frequent and pervasive, particularly concerning passive voice and subject-verb agreement.
- Attempts to use a mix of simple and compound sentences to describe the sequence of events.
- Severe errors in forming the passive voice.
- Consistent subject-verb agreement errors.
- Errors in pluralization and article usage.
Master the passive voice, which is essential for describing processes. Review basic subject-verb agreement rules.
Candidate Response
Task Achievement Insights
Task 1 must be strictly objective. Personal opinions and evaluations are not allowed.
Subjective commentary is strictly banned in Task 1.
Task 1 requires an objective summary of the data, not personal opinions or recommendations.
The diagram shows non-recyclable waste going to landfill disposal, not being burned in a factory.
The diagram specifies crushing and melting for glass waste.
Speculation about cost is not supported by the diagram.
Personal opinions and speculation are not permitted in Task 1.
The diagram shows the creation of new products, but does not show them going to shops.
Subjective evaluations are inappropriate for an objective Task 1 report.
Task 1 must not contain personal opinions or recommendations.
Coherence Improvements
Overuse of basic linkers; better to integrate cohesion.
Lexical Upgrades
The word environment is misspelled.
Every day should be two words when used as an adverbial phrase.
The word beginning requires a double n.
The diagram shows a garbage truck or vehicle, not a car.
The correct spelling is categories.
Waste does not become disposal; it is sent to or disposed of in a landfill.
Grammar Refinements
The singular subject diagram requires the singular verb shows.
The noun waste is uncountable and takes a singular verb.
The passive voice requires the past participle seen.
Garbage is an uncountable noun and requires a singular verb.
The pronoun refers to uncountable garbage, so it should be it.
The comparative form of easy is easier.
The noun government requires the definite article in this context.
The quantifier many must be followed by a plural noun.
The singular subject requires a singular verb.
Rubbish is an uncountable noun and cannot be pluralized.
In a general sense alongside workers, machines should be plural.
The number two requires a plural noun.
When referring to the second of two options, the other is used with a singular verb.
The singular pronoun it requires the singular verb turns.
Waste is uncountable and takes a singular verb.
The passive voice requires the past participle melted.
When a noun modifies another noun, it is typically singular.
The passive voice requires the past participle shredded.
The verb must agree with the subject metal waste.
The context implies multiple items.
The passive voice requires past participles.
Continuing the passive construction, these verbs must be in the past participle form.
Modal verbs like can must be followed by the base form of the verb.
Countable nouns should be plural in a list of examples.
The past participle compared is required here.
The compound subject is plural and requires seem.
The phrase one or two requires the plural noun processes.
The adjective similar is followed by to, not with.
The singular pronoun it requires needs.
It is more natural to use the plural temperatures here.
The conjunction that is needed to introduce the nominal clause.
Waste is uncountable and requires the singular verb goes.
The transitive verb use requires an object.
Vocabulary Distribution
Practice Set 15 - Test 1 - Task 1
The diagram below shows the process by which household waste is recycled. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Explore the Writing feedback you need
What this Writing checker covers
Ready to check your IELTS Writing?
Create a free account and open Auvoxi Studio to submit your Writing Task 1 or Task 2 response.
Check My Writing in Studio for Free